Brooks vs Hoka: How to Pick the Right Running Shoe for You

Overview

Both Brooks and Hoka are powerhouse brands in the running world, each offering distinct benefits and appealing to different types of runners. Whether you’re loyal to a particular model from Brooks or are intrigued by the maximalist cushioning of Hoka, choosing between these brands can depend on the type of runs you do, your running style, and the fit that works best for your feet.

This comparison will help you decide which brand and model might be right for you by mapping Brooks and Hoka equivalents, along with guidelines for picking the right shoe.

Brooks vs. Hoka Shoe Comparison

Cushioning and Ride Feel

• Brooks: Known for their plush, durable cushioning, Brooks shoes are typically designed for comfort and stability. The DNA LOFT and BioMoGo DNA foams provide a soft but responsive ride, perfect for long-distance runners who value a smooth and supportive experience.
• Hoka: Hoka is famed for its maximalist cushioning, providing a softer, more cushioned feel, particularly in models with thicker midsoles. The EVA foam used in Hoka shoes offers a plush underfoot experience, with a rocker design that promotes a smooth transition through the gait cycle. Hoka shoes are lightweight despite their bulky appearance, catering to both road and trail runners.

If You Run in Brooks, What’s the Hoka Equivalent?

• Brooks Ghost vs. Hoka Clifton:
• The Brooks Ghost is known for its balanced cushioning and durability, making it a versatile choice for daily runs.
• The Hoka Clifton, similar in softness, offers lightweight, plush cushioning with a more maximalist profile, making it an excellent alternative for runners looking for a cushioned daily trainer with a lightweight feel.
• Brooks Glycerin vs. Hoka Bondi:
• The Brooks Glycerin provides a plush, luxurious ride with its DNA LOFT cushioning, perfect for runners looking for maximum comfort over long distances.
• The Hoka Bondi is Hoka’s most cushioned shoe, comparable to the Glycerin in terms of softness and comfort, but with a more prominent rocker for an effortless transition through each stride.
• Brooks Adrenaline GTS vs. Hoka Arahi:
• For those needing stability, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS offers a supportive, yet cushioned experience with its GuideRails system, helping to correct overpronation.
• Hoka’s Arahi provides similar support with a lightweight feel, making it an excellent choice for runners who need stability without sacrificing comfort or cushioning.
• Brooks Cascadia vs. Hoka Speedgoat:
• The Brooks Cascadia is a go-to for trail runners, offering grip, durability, and protection on tough terrains.
• The Hoka Speedgoat, built for rugged trails, provides even more cushioning and a lightweight feel, perfect for technical trails and long-distance trail running.

Pros and Cons

Brooks

• Pros:
• Reliable cushioning that adapts to your stride for comfort and stability.
• Wide variety of models for both neutral and stability runners.
• Durable and long-lasting shoes with excellent grip for road and trail running.
• Cons:
• Brooks shoes tend to be slightly heavier compared to other brands, particularly models designed for cushioning and stability.
• The plushness of Brooks models can feel less responsive for runners seeking speed.

Hoka

• Pros:
• Maximalist cushioning provides exceptional comfort, especially for long-distance runners or those prone to joint pain.
• Lightweight designs despite the bulky appearance, particularly in models like the Clifton and Bondi.
• Smooth rocker design helps promote an efficient stride.
• Cons:
• The extra cushioning in Hoka shoes may not suit runners who prefer a more grounded or firm ride.
• Some runners may find the larger soles and stack height difficult to adjust to, especially if switching from a more minimal shoe.

How to Pick the Right Shoe for You

1. Identify Your Running Goals: Are you primarily focused on long-distance comfort, speed, or stability? If you need a shoe for marathons or daily training, a cushioned model like the Brooks Ghost or Hoka Clifton might be ideal. If you need stability, consider the Brooks Adrenaline GTS or Hoka Arahi.
2. Consider Your Foot Type: If you have high arches and need neutral support, the Brooks Glycerin or Hoka Bondi are top choices. If you overpronate and need stability, the Brooks Adrenaline or Hoka Arahi will provide the guidance you need without compromising on comfort.
3. Think About Terrain: If you run on trails, the Brooks Cascadia or Hoka Speedgoat offer the durability and protection required for rugged paths. If you stick to roads, the Brooks Ghost or Hoka Clifton are excellent choices.
4. Cushioning Preference: If you prefer a plush, cushioned ride, Hoka's maximalist shoes (like the Bondi) might be more your style. If you want something a bit firmer but still cushioned, Brooks models like the Ghost or Adrenaline offer a balanced ride.

Conclusion

Both Brooks and Hoka cater to a wide range of runners, but they excel in different areas. Brooks offers consistent cushioning and stability in a variety of models suited for long-distance runners or those needing extra support. Hoka, with its maximalist cushioning and innovative designs, provides a softer, more lightweight ride, perfect for runners looking for superior comfort with a fast feel.

Choosing between them comes down to your specific needs, running style, and preference for fit and cushioning. If you value a plush but responsive shoe with stability, Brooks might be your best fit. If you prioritize maximal cushioning and a lightweight design, Hoka will likely meet your needs.